🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the convention four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in other EU countries