🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."